Search 487 unique source-attributed armaments: 377 base-game entries (305 existing numerical references and 72 newly recovered pinned Regulation 1.17 equipment names and minimum requirements with unknown attack/weight), 102 Shadow of the Erdtree entries, and 8 Tarnished Pack / Tarnished Edition weapons and shields. Base +0 source observations exist for 305 legacy numerical reference rows and all 102 expansion rows; the 72 newly recovered pinned source-only base-game rows have UNKNOWN +0 attack, critical, scaling and weight (Stone-Sheathed Sword's 89 vs 119 discrepancy remains unresolved); all 8 new Pack entries have source-labelled Regulation 1.17.3 requirements/weights; all 8 have source-attributed community +0 attack, critical and scaling (3 individual wiki pages, 4 weapon-class tables, and Ritual Thrusting Shield confirmed across named public guides); Ritual still has disagreed-on weight and Strength requirement. Stone-Sheathed Sword now has published +0 physical 89 but contradicts a 119 headline, and its weight 3.5 conflicts with 5; separately, six +0 base attacks and one attribute requirement have unresolved cross-source disagreements. See the source dispute audit.
IMPORTANT DATA LIMITATION. These are actual named game weapons, but the community records are not verified for Regulation 1.17.3. Stone-Sheathed Sword has cited community +0 89 / critical 100 / C-D grades, but the same wiki's 119 headline conflicts; source weight 3.5 vs 5 also differs. Both attack and weight are excluded from trusted calculation. Seven other DLC rows carry independent cross-source review flags: six +0 damage disagreements with public Regulation 1.17 and one attribute requirement disagreement (Madding Hand FAI 13 vs 20, with a separate Regulation 1.17.3-labelled secondary reference now corroborating 20). A further Tarnished Pack secondary disagreement concerns Ritual Thrusting Shield weight (10 versus 9) and Strength requirement (13 versus 15); we block these disputed calculations. No current-game screenshot was independently reviewed; neither source is silently treated as a game-certified answer. Other DLC rows include 68 individually linked weapon-page +0 references and 33 wiki category-table comparisons. None is current-regulation game certified or a player AR. Unknown values are left blank, never zeroed or fabricated. Base attack is NOT your character's Attack Rating. No game assets or extracted regulation files are bundled.
New: 72 recovered armament +0 source references
Community-publication candidate values for all 72 previously requirements-only entries (unupgraded attack, weight, critical and initial scaling) are now available in the separate 72-item source evidence review. The original calculation-safe catalog still marks these 72 attack/weight fields unknown. Select one of these 72 armaments below to see cited +0 attack, weight and scaling previews directly in the weapon detail panel, with separate source values and dispute labels. Eight weapons have source disputes. All 126 originally unreported scaling-grade cells now have an explicitly written named third-source unupgraded grade (29 Fextralife Standard rows, 3 historical Fandom Standard rows, 1 PureEldenRing unupgraded row). The original blanks remain visible for provenance; none of the additional published grades is game-client certified. These preview numbers do not participate in damage, equip load, AR, sorting or comparisons.
Community weapon records—377 base (72 source-only) + 102 Shadow of the Erdtree + 8 Tarnished Pack
Game patchUnverifiedData source is not confirmed for 1.17.3
Your dataLocalSame-origin JSON, no API or account
Search weapons
Checking bundled source-field availability…
“Complete” means +0 base attack, minimum requirements and individual weapon weight are present without a flagged catalog source conflict. It does not mean verified against the current game or cleared for third-party redistribution. “Partial” includes unknown and disputed fields; the research-only 72-item preview is not used to fill original catalog numbers.
* Two-hand filter uses a conservative ordinary melee Strength assumption, not a guarantee for paired/special grips. Requirement-shortfall sorting puts records with unknown requirements last and uses the source-reported one-handed rule. Damage and weight filters exclude records with unknown values; the 102 sourced Shadow of the Erdtree and 8 sourced Tarnished Pack +0 references are published, but the seven disputed attack rows are excluded from numerical damage filtering but are NOT confirmed for the current regulation and cannot calculate AR. Base damage types do not imply final AR or actual damage.
Loading weapon records…
Your character · Find usable weapons
Change your current levels to check minimum requirements. Standard two-handing is a conditional Strength bonus, not an AR or damage estimate.
Actual weapon name · Community numeric data
—
—
Reported weight—
Reported critical—
Reported +0 base attack (where available; not AR)
Unverified +0 published reference preview
Evidence only, not a current-patch calculation. These values are not used by weight, damage, AR or sort filters. Agreement between websites does not prove the game client. A = Eldenpedia published reading; B = Tarnished.app published reading; C = an explicitly printed named third-site unupgraded row (Fextralife / historical Fandom / PureEldenRing, each individually linked).
Published weight — not used for equip load—
Published critical—
Published unupgraded attack
Published initial scaling grades
Requirements · pinned v1.17 vs public reference
NOT REPORTED means a published page omits this field. It does not mean zero or that scaling is explicitly "-". ⚠ marks a disagreement or omission requiring review.
These are published integer base-attack values, not exact reinforcement coefficients. Character attribute scaling, affinities, PvE damage and total AR are not calculated.
Upgrade track must be checked in your game. A community-published reinforcement reference may supply a Somber hint; source base attack values are NOT your current weapon +level.
Weapon names, requirements and base stats are community references, not game-certified values.
For paired, ranged and special weapons, the normal two-hand Strength rule may not apply. Check the weapon's actual in-game behavior. Real AR, reinforcement, buffs and damage are not computed here.
Side-by-side · Reference facts only
Compare up to 3 weapons
0 of 3 selected
Choose a weapon above and select “Add to reference comparison”. This compares +0 base attack components, weight, requirements and letter grades. It does not calculate actual AR, upgrades, infusion, DPS or enemy damage.
Choose a weapon to start.
Loading community weapon data…
Where do these numbers come from?
The factual fields in the original 305 unique base-game numeric rows (one identical duplicate Erdtree Seal source record was removed) are a compact derivative of the open-source Elden Ring API community dataset, source revision 1d2626c. Its API source declares MIT licensing, but this does not grant rights to unrelated game artwork, writing or proprietary assets. We exclude all source imagery, descriptions and lore text.
Three visibly inconsistent numerical entries were individually cross-checked with published weapon references. We track 102 Shadow of the Erdtree weapons and shields: 102 with +0 source-reported base-attack arrays (69 individual weapon pages, 33 wiki class comparison tables), including Stone-Sheathed Sword's disputed 89 +0 candidate versus 119 headline and conflicting 3.5 versus 5 weight; it remains excluded from trusted damage and load calculations. Three of the 101 records contain an explicitly unknown (?) scaling letter rather than a guessed grade. Six weapons have community-published +0 to +10 base-attack tables. No reinforcement scaling coefficients, affinity profiles or total AR are certified. Eight extra Tarnished Pack entries have named public roster corroboration and source-reported requirements and weights in a Regulation 1.17.3-labelled equipment reference; all eight have sourced community +0 attack, critical and letter grades (three individual wiki pages, four named wiki class table rows, and Ritual Thrusting Shield's separately corroborated 135 physical, critical 100, D/D scaling). Ritual's reported weight/STR requirements remain disputed among secondary sources, so load/wield checks remain blocked. The patch-labelled secondary site lists *max-upgrade* attack and is never used as +0. No game-client screenshot was reviewed. Other entries are not confirmed for the current patch. Source-code attribution and corrections are documented in the repository.
Why can't this calculate true AR yet?
Letter grades such as B or D cannot determine exact scaling coefficients, reinforcement tables or affinity changes. Many DLC records contain only names or requirements. None of these alone can determine a character's full attack rating or PvE damage.
For current official rules, see App 1.17.2 / Regulation 1.17.3. The separately maintained v1.17 reference AR workbench already offers an opt-in free public parameter source and local calculations. We now use Tarnished.dev v1.17 as a same-input numerical benchmark instead of demanding that visitors install the game. Before describing results as Tarnished.dev-benchmarked, we must actually record passing comparison cases. Current Regulation 1.17.3 game-client accuracy remains a separate, stronger claim.